First, I want to commend Liz Churchill for her bravery in posting a video so graphic that many will undoubtedly call for its removal. This video reveals the heartbreaking reality of abortion—an unfiltered view of what happens to babies during the procedure. Of course, it’s offensive to many. But that’s precisely the point. The Democratic Party does not want you to witness the true horror of abortion. They continue to perpetuate the narrative that a baby in the womb is not a living being until birth. Not only is this a lie, but it’s also the most dehumanizing and insidious form of political manipulation. By referring to babies as just a “clumps of cells” they obscure the truth and strip away the humanity of the unborn. These are the tools of dehumanization.
The Debate Over Late-Term Abortions: Exposing the Lies
Let’s revisit the Trump-Harris debate. During the exchange, Kamala Harris and the moderator told 60 million Americans that Trump was lying about late-term abortions, including post-birth abortions. Yet, Trump was 100% correct. He wasn’t allowed to defend his position because the moderator, Linsey Davis, performing a live "fact-check," falsely claimed that no states permit such procedures, Kamala Harris was complicit in this lie remaining silent and letting ABC News do its bidding for her.
Here are the facts:
Six states and Washington, D.C., do not impose any term restrictions on abortion. This remains unchanged, even after the overturning of Roe. Source: [Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe, as of September 10, 2024.]
In 2023, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz signed a bill (HF 1) establishing a right to abortion for any reason, at any time during pregnancy. He also signed a bill (SF 2995) repealing the requirement to provide lifesaving care to infants born alive after failed abortions. Under this legislation, viable babies can be left to die with only “comfort care.” Babies with disabilities, whose lives are often devalued, are especially at risk. Minnesota’s abortion policy is now among the most extreme in the world—an ominous preview of what a Harris-Walz administration could pursue in the White House. Source: MCCL News Release, September 11, 2024.
This isn’t just immoral; it allegedly violated state law. Walz’s response? Repeal the very law that exposed this horror and replace it with an unrestricted regime of abortion-on-demand on the front end, and infanticide on the back end.
Minnesota's extreme abortion policy allowing for abortion for any reason— In 2023, lawmakers enacted a “fundamental right” to abortion (HF 1) with no limitations at any stage in pregnancy (legislators rejected dozens of amendments that would have made the law more moderate, including amendments to prevent elective abortions in the third trimester). Lawmakers in 2023 also repealed a 1974 law that had limited abortion after viability, leaving no gestational limit remaining in Minnesota statute (SF 2995). Source: MCCL.Org
Election Interference and Defamation
Kamala Harris lied, Linsey Davis lied, and ABC News was complicit in perpetuating these lies. So, where are the retractions? Any respectable news organization would have issued a correction, yet ABC has remained silent. Their failure to correct the record has not only misled the public but also tarnished Donald Trump’s character, making him appear uninformed. This was deliberate defamation and political interference, executed in front of nearly 60 million viewers.
Should Trump pursue litigation for defamation and election interference? Absolutely. Late-term abortions and post-birth abortions are not figments of Trump’s imagination—they are real, and they are supported by the policies of Harris and Walz. In fact, under Walz’s administration, at least five babies were born alive after botched abortions and left to die. Two of these babies were given “comfort care”—meaning they were kept comfortable until death, rather than receiving the lifesaving medical treatment they deserved.
Liz Churchill’s video sheds light on the horrifying truth that the Democratic Party, including Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, and their media allies, are desperate to conceal. Abortion isn’t just a “right.” It’s a tragedy, a moral catastrophe, and a human rights violation of the highest order. The fact that ABC News continues to propagate lies without issuing retractions should be met with legal consequences, and Kamala Harris must be held accountable for misleading nearly 60 million Americans during the debate.
This is no longer just a political debate—it’s a battle for truth and the fight for the lives of the unborn. We must stand firm, ask the difficult questions, and call out the hypocrisy, no matter how uncomfortable it may be for the Left.
The Importance of Fact-Checking:
It’s more important than ever to fact-check the information presented not only in the debates but also in the media, including this article. Misinformation, especially on issues as critical as abortion, threatens both the truth and the lives of the unborn. If we allow lies and propaganda to go unchecked, we risk descending into a society that no longer values truth—a path reminiscent of the misinformation campaigns of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
By fact-checking, we preserve truth and protect the innocent. Our responsibility is not just to challenge the falsehoods presented by political candidates and media outlets but to ensure that future generations inherit a society that upholds the value of every human life. Don’t just take the information at face value—research, verify, and hold those in power accountable for the lives that hang in the balance.
The Exploitation of Crisis and the Call to Action
Kamala Harris and Tim Walz may be leading the charge, but they are not acting alone. The media serves as their megaphone, amplifying their agenda and shielding the public from the brutal reality of their policies. The Democratic Party has mastered the art of exploiting crisis and chaos to advance its goals—whether it's the mass elimination of unborn lives under the banner of "reproductive rights" or the rebranding of infanticide as "compassionate care." In reality, these policies harm the very people they claim to protect.
A Challenge to the Reader:
Before forming your opinion, I challenge you to confront the difficult questions presented in this article. Watch Liz Churchill’s video (Mature Audience Only). Review the evidence and take a hard look at what abortion really entails. Then ask yourself: Can you trust Kamala Harris or the media on this issue? Do you still believe an aborted baby is merely a “clump of cells,” or do you, like me, see a living, breathing human being, deserving of dignity and protection? The truth may be uncomfortable, but the lives of the innocent demand that we face it.
For more insight on this critical issue, explore the article below. Where difficult questions about the pro-choice narrative are considered and each pro-choice position will be scrutinized and met with a reasoned, evidence-based response—grounded in science, ethical principles, and facts.
A Practical Review of Pro-Choice Positions (Article)
Comments