As we approach the 2024 election, a significant conversation is unfolding among certain Republican and Christian voters. Some are expressing hesitation to support Donald Trump, citing his character flaws, past controversies, and what they perceive as unpresidential demeanor. They argue that their vote should go to someone who is, if not perfect, then at least free from serious blemishes in both character and conduct.
This perspective, while understandable to some extent, misses the broader context of what is at stake in this election. The notion that the person who receives our vote must be without sin or any negative history is an idealistic, yet ultimately impractical, standard—especially in the rough-and-tumble world of politics.
The Biblical story of Jesus and the Pharisees provides a relevant lesson here. When confronted with a woman accused of adultery, the Pharisees sought to trap Jesus into either condemning the woman to death according to Jewish Law or violating Roman law, which was the law of the land at the time. Instead, Jesus responded with the now-famous words, "He who is without sin, let him cast the first stone." This response highlighted the hypocrisy of the accusers, reminding them—and us—that everyone has flaws.
In a political context, this principle translates into the understanding that no candidate will ever be perfect. Every politician, Trump included, has a past filled with decisions and actions that can be scrutinized and criticized. However, the question we must ask ourselves is not whether a candidate is perfect, but whether their policies and vision align with our values and the direction we believe the country should take.
Donald Trump’s presidency, despite its controversies, brought about significant changes that aligned with conservative values. His judicial appointments, including those that led to the reversal of Roe v. Wade, his stance on religious freedoms, and his commitment to deregulation and economic growth, all reflect a policy agenda that resonates with many conservative and Christian voters.
Consider the recent Supreme Court decision that narrowly upheld the status quo against the Biden-Harris administration changes to Title IX. These proposed changes which would have expanded protections to include sexual orientation and gender identity, allowing biological males to participate in women's sports. The 5-4 decision was a close call, and it serves as a reminder of how crucial it is to have justices who uphold the values that many conservatives hold dear. Had Donald Trump not been in office to appoint the justices he did, the decision could have easily swung in the opposite direction.
Moreover, issues such as free speech, religious liberty, and national sovereignty are all on the line in this election. The alternative to Trump is not just a different personality but a radically different vision for America—one that many conservatives believe would lead the country down a dangerous path toward socialism, censorship, and a loss of individual freedoms.
For those who are contemplating sitting out this election because they are disillusioned with Trump's imperfections, it is important to recognize that abstaining from voting is, in effect, casting the proverbial stone. By choosing not to vote, they are, in essence, passing judgment on Trump and, by extension, on the policies and values that they themselves hold dear. This decision, whether intended or not, contributes to the very outcome they fear—a leadership that does not align with their principles.
In the end, the choice in 2024 is not about finding a perfect candidate but about supporting the person who will fight for the values and policies that align with our beliefs. For many, that person is Donald Trump, not because he is without flaws, but because his policies and track record show a commitment to the principles that matter most to conservative and Christian voters.
To focus on imperfections at the expense of the bigger picture is to risk losing the very freedoms and values that define America. The stakes are too high, and the consequences too severe, to allow perfectionism to guide our decisions in this critical election. So before anyone decides to sit this one out, they should ask themselves: Is it really worth throwing that stone?
Another good read on this: America
People who God used despite their mistakes: People
Comments