Some things just don't pass the smell test, and the Democrats' plan for the upcoming election reeks worse than a compost bin full of month-old campaign flyers. If you're wondering how anyone could possibly steal an election with a straight face, well, sit back, grab some popcorn, and let's walk through this circus of absurdity.
Georgia: The State Where Voter Fraud is Just a Suggestion
Georgia, the land of peaches, has suddenly become the land of fuzzy election rules. According to reports, a judge ruled that election officials must certify results even if voter fraud is suspected. Yes, you read that correctly. So, apparently, fraud is no longer a reason to pump the brakes. It's just a minor inconvenience on the fast track to "certified" results.
But wait—it gets better. The Democrats are also suing to prevent any surveillance on those oh-so-innocent Dropbox locations. That's right. They're all in for free-range Drop boxing. No cameras, no oversight, just a whole lot of trust. Because, as we all know, elections are always won on trust...right?
Virginia: Cleaning Voter Rolls? Cue the Lawsuits!
If you thought election integrity meant keeping accurate voter rolls, think again. Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin made the audacious move of cleaning up the voter rolls—removing more than 6,000 non-citizens. You'd think the Department of Justice would send a "thank you" card, right? Wrong.
The Biden administration decided to sue over this travesty of good housekeeping. Why? Apparently, letting non-citizens vote is now a civil right! One has to wonder, are we living in America or auditioning for an episode of Twilight Zone?
Michigan: Where Counting Votes Twice is Soooo 2023
Meanwhile, Michigan’s Governor Gretchen Whitmer decided that democracy works better when you don't recount votes. Who needs accuracy when you can have speed? It's like a fast-food drive-thru approach to elections: one count, no questions, and definitely no refunds. If you think this sounds suspiciously like Banana Republic tactics, congratulations, you're paying attention.
And in case there’s any doubt left about the integrity of Michigan's elections, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson took things a step further. She not only banned those pesky poll challengers from asking questions but directed clerks to ignore signature matching on absentee ballots. You know, the basic safety measure that stops your dearly departed grandmother from voting for the fifth time.
Benson’s bold solution? Instruct Michigan citizens to snitch on anyone challenging election results—channeling that vintage, feel-good spirit of, "Your neighbor's probably guilty, so turn 'em in!" Add a judge's ruling calling out her antics, and you’ve got the makings of an electoral farce.
Kamala Harris: ID Optional, Photocopy Impossible
In a recent stroke of genius, Kamala Harris explained that rural America is so poor, they can't even take a photocopy of their ID cards. Yes, apparently, they’re just sitting around in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by tumbleweeds and totally incapable of finding a copier. Her solution? Well, let's just ditch the whole ID thing altogether for voting! Problem solved, right?
Looks like India is richer than the U.S. now since everyone there has a voter ID! Maybe someone forgot to tell Kamala that 97% of people in the U.S. own a mobile phone, and 90% of those have smartphones. You know what that means? Clicking a photo of an ID is about as easy as taking a selfie with a latte. What planet does she live on? Kamala interview video 2 minutes
Congress: Proof of Citizenship? How Dare You!
Enter the SAVE Act—aka, "Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act," which sounds reasonable until you realize that Democrats are convinced that asking someone to prove they’re a U.S. citizen before they vote is tantamount to burning democracy at the stake. This bill would have the nerve to require a document proving citizenship, like a birth certificate or passport. You know, trivial things we all somehow manage to provide when applying for jobs, driver’s licenses, or buying a fishing permit.
Naturally, Senate leadership and the Biden administration are opposed. Their reasoning? Asking for proof of citizenship might "disenfranchise" certain groups. Which groups, you ask? Apparently, anyone who's having a really hard time proving they actually live in this country.
The Grand Finale: Election Integrity is Just a Word
What does all this add up to? A breathtaking attempt to undermine the basic tenets of election integrity, leaving common sense gasping for air like a fish out of water. Drop boxes with zero oversight, lawsuits to keep non-citizens on voter rolls, and banning recounts? This isn't election integrity—this is a three-ring circus with a neon sign that reads, "Steal it if you can!"
The Democrats have crafted a perfect plan: make elections so insecure, so chaotic, that even questioning it will get you labeled a conspiracy theorist. And what's the end game? Well, if this runaway clown car makes it past 2024 without crashing, the American people will be left wondering: "Did we just let them get away with it?"
So buckle up, folks. The Election Heist of 2024 is shaping up to be the most ludicrous, laughable, and dare I say, suspicious political event of the century. And if we're not careful, "election integrity" will soon be nothing more than a dusty relic in the Smithsonian, right next to the typewriter used to draft the SAVE Act.
Disclaimer: This is just a brief summary of the most recent election-related issues swirling around our country. There are countless more examples of questionable decisions and actions that could fill volumes. But for now, we’ve just scratched the surface.
So, why wouldn’t the states and our elected officials want to ensure a clean, fair election? What could possibly be the motive behind making elections less secure? Are they hiding something? The question you should be asking is: What are they afraid of—and why don't they want you to know?
Comments