You know, there’s a special kind of genius that comes out when you give politicians the reins to ridiculous laws—or better yet, the absence of laws. And this time, it was Governor Mark "No-ID-No-Problem" Gordon from the great state of Wyoming who decided to show the rest of the country just how absurd the idea of voting without an ID really is.
The scene? Picture this: New York State, land of skyscrapers, Broadway, and pizza slices bigger than your head. A political giant. A behemoth of electoral power. And then there’s Wyoming, population: roughly the size of a decent high school football game crowd. But Governor Gordon saw an opportunity, nay, a golden loophole, to give his tiny state a shot at shifting big New York elections without a single ID in sight.
Gordon’s Big Plan: No IDs? No Problem!
Here’s where the genius kicks in. Gordon realized that New York, a state famous for its anything goes approach to elections, was ripe for a little Wyoming-shaped surprise. After all, with the Democrats voting down the SAVE Act not once, not twice, but FOUR times,
there was no ID requirement. Heck, you could show up with a library card and a pack of gum and still vote!
So, Gordon concocted a master plan: bus loads of Wyomingites – yes, all 12 of them – shipped straight to the Big Apple. Their mission? Vote early, vote often, and vote like they were New Yorkers — because who needs proof of residency or citizenship when a polite “yep, I’m a citizen” will do just fine under the current system?
Now, you may be asking yourself, “Why would anyone do this?” Well, my friend, why wouldn’t they? If the system is open to abuse, wouldn’t it be irresponsible not to take advantage of it? It’s practically a civic duty at that point. And boy, did Gordon's bold Wyoming-to-New York operation expose the lunacy of it all.
SAVE Act: The Bill That Could Save Common Sense (If the Democrats Let It)
Let’s rewind for a second. The SAVE Act is pretty straightforward. It says, “Hey, maybe we should require people to prove they’re U.S. citizens before they vote in U.S. elections.” Revolutionary, right? Something as simple as showing a REAL ID, U.S. passport, or some other official document that proves you’re, well, legally allowed to vote. I mean, you need an ID to buy cough syrup these days, but voting? Nah, just pinky-promise you’re legit!
But apparently, the Democratic Party finds this notion highly problematic. I mean, why wouldn’t they want IDs at the polls? They’ve called the SAVE Act everything from "racist" to "discriminatory." Funny how that works, though—when you attend a rally for Kamala Harris, you need an ID at the door. Going to any Democrat fundraiser? ID, please. Want to drive a car? You guessed it, ID. But when it comes to voting, suddenly it’s oppression.
It’s almost as if there’s some ulterior motive here. Could it be that…gasp…requiring an ID might make it harder to influence an election? That can’t be it. Surely, no one would want to rig a vote or allow shady, non-citizen ballots to tilt the outcome. Right? I mean, after all, we’re constantly being told there’s “no significant evidence of voter fraud.” And by "no significant evidence," they mean “we aren’t really looking, and please don’t ask questions.”
Governor Gordon’s Ingenious Experiment
Now, back to Governor Gordon, whose plan to send busloads of his trusty Wyoming residents to vote in New York made a huge splash. When Wyomingites started flooding the polls in Brooklyn, Bronx, and even Harlem, voters got confused. I mean, what would you do if someone in cowboy boots and a “How to Rope Cattle in 10 Days” t-shirt showed up and started voting on your mayoral race?
Gordon was just trying to prove a point. He didn’t need thousands of people; he just needed a handful of savvy voters to cast ballots across multiple precincts to demonstrate how unprotected these elections are without the SAVE Act. Because let’s be real— if Wyoming can make a dent in New York’s elections, something has gone terribly wrong.
The media, of course, went wild, calling it "election interference" and "a deliberate attempt to undermine democracy." But here’s the kicker: all of Gordon’s voters signed the affidavit that they were U.S. citizens. They even signed it twice—once in cursive, for emphasis.
The SAVE Act: A Common-Sense Solution
So, what’s really going on with the SAVE Act? It’s a simple, straightforward solution to the problem of non-citizens voting in U.S. elections. The Act doesn’t ask much: just prove you’re a citizen before casting your ballot. Yet, four times, Democrats have refused to vote for it. Why?
Well, if you ask me—and I’m just a humble political elephant here—it’s all about power. If they can keep the rules as loose and squishy as a bowl of Jell-O, the easier it is to game the system. It’s hard to secure your electoral base when you don’t know who’s voting or where they came from.
Citizenship may be a requirement to vote, but actually proving it? That’s apparently asking too much. After all, a government-issued ID with your birthplace on it could, in some minds, be the most insidious form of oppression since…well, since they started requiring IDs for everything else.
Conclusion: Lunacy Exposed
So, hats off to Governor Gordon for his brilliant demonstration of how the no-ID policy is a farce. His Wyoming-to-New York operation exposed the lunacy behind the Democrats’ refusal to pass the SAVE Act. The underlying motive is as clear as a Wyoming sky—keep the voting process as opaque as possible, and you’ll never have to worry about the legitimacy of the outcome.
In a world where you need an ID to buy a six-pack of beer, shouldn’t we ask for the same when someone’s casting a vote to determine the future of our country? Apparently, only Governor Gordon and the rest of the common-sense brigade seem to think so. Everyone else? They’re too busy checking your ID at the door to their next rally.
Yorumlar