You thought it couldn't get any crazier. First, it was men who identified as women, and women who identified as men. Society, without so much as a raised eyebrow, embraced the idea that biology could be decided by feelings rather than pesky little things like chromosomes. "You feel it, so you are it" has become the mantra of the day.
But wait—this train had no brakes.
Cue Rachel Dolezal, the proud transracial trailblazer who, despite being born white, "identified" as a black woman. She wasn’t just pretending, folks—no, no, she felt it. Never mind the inconvenient detail of DNA; feelings now have their own scientific category. Sure, Dolezal led the NAACP before being unceremoniously exposed as an "impostor" by the very crowd that insists on believing identities can be fluid. You see, in the liberal playbook, it’s okay to be transracial—unless you're Rachel Dolezal. Then you’re just a liar. Because, as we all know, only some lies are valid if they align with the right agenda. Confused yet? Don’t worry, it gets better.
The trans-mania didn’t stop with gender or race. Enter the world of "transabled." No, this isn’t some niche superhero genre. This is the new reality where healthy people decide they’re actually disabled and demand to be treated as such. One British man was so committed to his identity as an amputee that he chopped off his own arm. A North Carolina woman poured drain cleaner into her eyes to fulfill her lifelong dream of being blind. And you thought people were crazy for eating Tide Pods!
But hold on—because now, for our next act of cultural absurdity, we give you… Trans-Ageism! That’s right, folks! We have grown men posting Craigslist ads looking for nannies because they identify as babies. I mean, if a man can be a woman, and a healthy person can be disabled, why can’t a middle-aged man have the mental breakdown of a toddler and hire someone to burp him after his juice box? Who are we to judge?
And if that's not enough for you, imagine this: next time you walk into a kindergarten classroom, don't be surprised if there's a 45-year-old man sitting cross-legged in a Dora the Explorer T-shirt, insisting he's a 6-year-old girl. He identifies that way, so don't you dare question it—bigot!
So where does this cultural Twilight Zone end? If a man can identify as a woman, and a woman can be a man, why can't a child buy alcohol because they feel 21? Why can't a teenager skip school, not because they want to play video games, but because they identify as a dog and should obviously be allowed in the nearest doggy daycare? Are we really going to deny this poor trans-species child a day full of belly rubs and chew toys?
And for the grand finale—why stop at feelings? If a child can feel like an adult, shouldn't they get to vote, drink, and even run for Congress? (Then again, could they really be worse than some of the adults currently in office?) And if a man feels like a baby, shouldn't his parents be required to support him? It’s time to stand up for the rights of 40-year-old toddlers everywhere!
This is where we're headed, folks: a world where feelings override reality, where truth is sacrificed at the altar of "self-expression." You can’t have it both ways, liberals. You can’t insist that gender is fluid, race is a construct, and healthy people can be disabled if they want, while simultaneously claiming that age, species, and biology still hold firm boundaries. If we're going to let someone pour bleach in their eyes to feel complete, shouldn't we also be letting a grown man enroll in kindergarten? Shouldn’t we let a child sue for emancipation because they identify as an adult?
When we start redefining everything based on feelings, we're not just bending the rules; we're shattering the whole game board and then wondering why nobody knows whose turn it is anymore. So, before we all start walking our kids on leashes to doggy daycare, maybe it's time to take a step back and think: how far is too far?
So, before the next wave of "trans-species toddlers" and "middle-aged babies" comes knocking, let’s ask ourselves: are we pushing the boundaries of progress, or just falling headfirst into the sandbox of insanity?
Comments